第五 post: Kings or presidents

If Kings are representatives, how do they represent every party? If they are proprietors, what is an superior scheme to advocate? If they are general managers, who are the ministers every person can trust?

This is always the first question that comes up in any gathered mass. Most people understand poverty, power distribution, survival and competition and education are not one man's issue, so why do presidents still campaigned for the impossible role?

Let's say they are more altruistic, should they treat those against their rule altruistically? If they are more nationalistic, should they allow cultural disparities? Perhaps they will be the most intelligent man chosen, are they a strategist or public speaker? What should they care for first and why?

There are many falsely accused or improperly trusted occupations on Earth, otherwise you could live by rules of the economy or a religion and not speak of opinions until they are someone else's problem. But if you believe you're not a consequence of anyone, or you can't persuade anyone to think the same, you might as well follow your heart under loopholes of governance. It will be much harder if placed at the center of the world, but how much respect can you pay to a single person